.

.

Home

.

Introduction

.

Topics

.

Indictment

.

Cultural void

.

Notes

.

Theologians are those who study what correlates to God. They, in their research, consider the metaphysics and religious faith as possible rules to arrive at the truth. Consequently, theology is principally interested to search presumed truth obtained through the dreams or revelations. Truth hypothesized that follow the principle according to which is possible to conceive the world, including the existence of man, excluding the objective reality as reliable source one's transcendental meaning.

.

The refusal to take scientific data as the foundation on which to consider the laws imposed by a supreme entity (which is: god or a creator or other entity of the system), opens a huge conflict in the culture. Especially in those who would consider the spiritual search into logical possibilities offered by reason. Few theologians in the world are now willing to recognize the laws of physics as a basis of transcendental truths in search of the real designs of God, An behavioural consequence of their studies, which inhibit on principle to establish a direct dialogue with the world of reality. In practice, the theology is a discipline which do not allow as dogma, to establish a rational meters with which to distinguish:
.

 the true from the false, the real from the imaginary, the fair from unfair.

.

.

.

Philosophers are those who divide their studies between theology and science. In their search for truth, they accept addresses theological and scientific as possible and compatible from a cultural point of view. Generally they do not take a position to establish the principles of truth as if were rationally "possible" equalize the concepts supported by empirical results with those built on pure imagination. An ambiguous collocation that poses the philosophers in the condition of not being able to determine clearly the concept of truth. Embarrassing condition that induce this category to use terminology often unclear and it is no coincidence that the academic study of philosophy
.

do not require advanced scientific knowledge to execute
 their own analysis.

.
The lack of advanced and objective studies precludes the philosopher from the possibility of producing a vision of reality that is the direct consequence of the rules supported by empirical science. In this way the current system forces to academic entourage 

..
to not express a conception of life which is the direct result of objective data now available.

..
Faculty, that of philosophy, which should be rebuilt from the foundation because it is not conceivable that it is not aware of the practice futility of its current arguments. Do not talk about fundamental issues is synonymous with lying.
The lack of consideration for the current philosophy stems from their low or useless Social Contribution. They are valued little or nothing by the media because they are in fact unable to propose concrete solutions to solve problems of the human community.
An incapability due in large part to the lack of objective analysis, the same ones that today are the foundation of the most advanced society. The philosophy should be the highest expression of reason and should teach to world how to live and behave. On the contrary, it is relegated to a marginal role because it suffers the submission towards constituted powers.
.

.

.

Scientists, instead, are those who study empirically the behavior of matter. The results of their research are accepted by all, even by theologians and philosophers, for the evident objectivity contained in them. Recognition due to a clear, obvious and rational logic.
.
But when the man of science overreaches the limit of the spiritual context in order to explain the real causes that induce the mankind to believe in imaginary truth, he must stop because:
.

the topic is not of his specific competence.

.

It is not clear who should deal with these arguments, because nobody is authorized in this sense. Evidently, it is no coincidence that this cultural void exists.
.
Is incredible, paradoxical and crazy, that, science is not allowed to formulate a project of human development that is adherent to the empirical data obtained by it. Essentially it is "forbidden" to scientific community
.

to conceive a concept of the human condition that both the direct application of those values real and concrete obtained through scientific research itself.

.
Would be interesting to know the thoughts of scientists as to why today's science investigates only specific disciplines, totally disregarding the general meaning emerging from them. As if, in doing research we analyze 
.

only individual parts of the problem without considering the overall picture final.
.

If men want to be credible and not reduce everything to a squalid farce it is essential to denounce the falsehood and hypocrisy of a culture based on nonsense. For institutions lie is already serious in itself, but induce people to believe in nonexistent is at least idiot.

.